Thread:209.197.136.112/@comment-26279493-20150623040113

Thanks for the contribution. I've removed several categories from the page for now. If you can provide evidence, we can put them back.

-Not Liberal: While I'm sure that there are plenty of Conservatives who are Freemasons, can you document why the organization should be labled "not Liberal". Having some non-Liberal members doesn't make an arganization "Not Liberal". Freemasons have, historically recognized Diests as brothers, and have resisted the establishment of Religion.

-Conspiracy: There are some great and very entertaining "Conspiracy Theories" involving Freemasons, but without some proof, these "Conspiracy Theories" shouldn't be recognized as "Conspiracies".

-Things Pseudoliberals Love: I've no doubt that there are plenty of pseudoliberals who love Freemasonry. Yet there are probably plenty folks from most political ideologies who are members. 