Thread:Pr1s0n3r0fl1f3666/@comment-66.183.41.215-20121105043901/@comment-5419775-20121105110622

"You next failed to include that I stepped in, and gave you another chance, extending your window of opportunity to reply by another 15 minutes."

I was not online at this time, so there is no way I could have known that. If it weren't for you, I would have been blocked even sooner.

"Your attempts to smear Conservapedia with blatant lies on intolerance of liberals are ridiculous. While Conservapedia is by nature less appealing to liberals, it is not inherently against liberals on it's website. I identify quite liberally on Conservapedia, and a quick look at EJamesW's postings will prove his point of view as well. Strangely though, we are both sysops at the website now, a clear disproof of your theory that liberals cannot thrive there."

This isn't an attempt to smear Conservapedia with blatant lies of intolerance of liberals. It was just an experiment to test out Conservapedia's blocking policy. I also did not fail to mention that the person who banned me identifies as a liberal, an atheist, and someone who accepts evolution, which surprised me. The fact that liberals can edit and become sysops is something I was now aware of in the past, and is something I now accept.

"Finally, your arguments that Ronald Reagan sucks, would not have been taken seriously in good faith. The 5 reasons you expounded, "pro-life, increased the national debt, deregulated the economy, created "Reagonomics", and being a Republican" clearly shows that you have not taken the time nor effort into creating thoughtful, reasonable responses to the question EJamesW posted."

I don't see how that is the case. According to Wikipedia, Reagan lowered taxes for things like oil windfall profits and lowered corporate taxes, and significantly raised taxes on those earning less than $50,000. He dismissed proposals to halt acid rain, and there was a 40% increase in defence spending, although this is justified to an extent due to the Cold War. He also declared more militant policies on the War on Drugs.

I don't see what is liberal about his policies. His policies appear to be conservative. Because of this, I view him fairly negatively as a president.

I have been bothered to do research on his policies. The entire point of this experiment was to test Conservapedia's blocking policies, which seem unfair.