Talk:Chuck Norris/@comment-5419775-20121202225012/@comment-3338975-20121203162810

It's pretty obvious what Proxima's reasoning is. A child can't be ultimately held responsible for their views, no matter how reprehensible they might be, because their brains are still developing and have not matured to the point where they can deliberate over the issues in a responsible manner (at least not as fully as adults can). If you still don't see the point in making that distinction, then either you're holding children to the same standard that you hold adults (which is rather harsh and unfair) or you're holding adults to the same standard you hold children (which would say a lot about how you view the capability of adults to find what you consider to be the truth without the assistance of an exterior force like the government, but I won't go any further into that).