Thread:EnderAlan04/@comment-26279493-20190720210318

Thanks for your edit, some good ideas there, but the execution was a bit off. I've rolled it back for now, because I'm just not up to fixing the edit. Perhaps one of the others can make it work. Your section on his recent vote on 9-11 responders would have been a good edition.

I understand your desire to distance Libertarianism from Rand Paul. There's a real segregationist, social darwinian, anarcho-capitalistic, even corporate-aristocracy, basis for American Libertarianism that might seem repugnant to other cultures. If you can find a way to differentiate a libertarian main-stream that's different from American Libertarianism, I could support that. But, calling Paul and the rest of the American Libertarians so-called in the main article is a bit much. To many of us in the States, these guys are Libertarianism, and it's ugly.  