Thread:Proxima Centauri/@comment-5419775-20130111122355/@comment-751688-20130112064858

Well, looks like Proxima's reason for deleting Maoist Rebel News was "Liberapedia is about the democratic left. We don't promote revolutionary communism that historically always lead to dictatorship. I’m concerned about the possible effect Unruhe can have on kids who haven’t yet learnt critical thinking. Further I..."

While I understand that there are real examples of immature (in sense of not being 18 yet) kids reading and editing the wiki, I think that the better solution would be to document the most important points that contradict the objective facts, like we do with the articles on, say, Venomfangx or Lennart Boecken.

A good example would be, say, rewriting the North Korea and Stalin bits to add something like ", despite numerous evidence to the contrary." We can mention that all three North Korean parties have the same agenda, and add references to Khrushchev's official report on Stalin's imprisonments and executions. (At the time, Stalin's "cult of personality" was to be destroyed, so the report wasn't biased towards reducing the scale of Stalin's crimes.)

After all, this website already shows very well that Liberalism is the better of the systems -- for example, by indicating that the more Liberal countries succeed at making the.

Oh, and the "Flag desecration" article wasn't deleted, just renamed to "Flag burning".

After all, we're editing an encyclopedia, for goodness's sake, not a Soviet newspaper! And our primary instruments should be truth and science, not removing articles about subjects we don't like.