Thread:Omashu Rocks/@comment-4342945-20121001200730

Even though we disagree on mostly everything else, I think you'll that it's rather ridiculous that a site calls itself Liberapedia and worships the obviously conservative Obama as being "liberal". It's just a part of a fad that I like to call Pseudoliberalism, where self proclaimed "liberals" support conservative leaders or figures and support them on the grounds of being "liberal". For example, Che Guevara while left, was not a liberal in the least. He was strongly supportive of Stalin and Mao, who are actually considered socially right (nowadays referred to as Conservatives, but those guys are the extreme kind).

But it just baffles me how ignorant people can be. While I don't mean to make this sound as if being socially right is evil, Obama's policies are becoming increasingly Orwellian, leading to a police state that is the complete opposite of what Liberalism is. Therefore, it would seem to me that the self-claimed "Liberals" should be considered pseudoliberals. 